{2023.06}[SYSTEM] code-server 4.100.2

[PetrKralCZ]

1 out of 1 required modules missing:

* code-server/4.100.2 (code-server-4.100.2.eb)

[bedroge]

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace

[eessi-bot-aws]

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_1183/88548

date	job status	comment
Sep 08 12:04:02 UTC 2025	submitted	job id 88548 awaits release by job manager
Sep 08 12:04:09 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 08 12:05:12 UTC 2025	running	job 88548 is running
Sep 08 12:09:17 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file slurm-88548.out ✅ no message matching FATAL: ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching FAILED: ✅ no message matching required modules missing: ✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations ✅ found message matching .tar.gz created! Artefacts eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17573331480.tar.gz size: 105 MiB (110967242 bytes) entries: 10444 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all code-server/4.97.2.lua software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software code-server/4.97.2 reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 no other files in tarball
Sep 08 12:09:17 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 441.667 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 447.889 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 1.82 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 1.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 3.91 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 4.05 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.58 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.56 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 7414.28 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 7259.44 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file slurm-88548.out ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

[eessi-bot-jsc]

New job on instance eessi-bot-jsc for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: nvidia-grace
Building for: aarch64/nvidia/grace
Job dir: /p/project1/ceasybuilders/eessibot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1183/14044540

date	job status	comment
Sep 08 12:04:04 UTC 2025	submitted	job id 14044540 awaits release by job manager
Sep 08 12:05:11 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 08 12:06:15 UTC 2025	running	job 14044540 is running
Sep 08 12:12:26 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file slurm-14044540.out ✅ no message matching FATAL: ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching FAILED: ✅ no message matching required modules missing: ✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations ✅ found message matching .tar.gz created! Artefacts eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-nvidia-grace-17573332450.tar.gz size: 106 MiB (111658916 bytes) entries: 10573 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/modules/all code-server/4.97.2.lua software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/software code-server/4.97.2 reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace no other files in tarball
Sep 08 12:12:26 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 2/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 3/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 4/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 5/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 6/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 7/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 8/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ OK ] ( 9/26) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: perf: 1534.562 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/26) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: perf: 1548.959 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (11/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 4.83 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (12/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 4.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (13/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /95ac9526 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 5.08 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (14/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /1cff5d41 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 5.11 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (15/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 6.87 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (16/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 6.83 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (17/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /0edb8a95 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 8.44 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (18/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b2ab2213 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 8.15 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (19/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (20/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.46 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (21/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /8ec94746 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.5 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (22/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1a3a497b @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.53 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (23/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 41780.47 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (24/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 42439.56 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (25/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /c9ca6dc1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 42496.08 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (26/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /17289b2f @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 42315.22 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 18/26 test case(s) from 26 check(s) (0 failure(s), 8 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file slurm-14044540.out ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

[eessi-bot-deucalion]

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.09/pr_1183/541219

date	job status	comment
Sep 08 12:04:05 UTC 2025	submitted	job id 541219 awaits release by job manager
Sep 08 12:04:53 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 08 12:06:09 UTC 2025	running	job 541219 is running
Sep 08 12:17:04 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file slurm-541219.out ✅ no message matching FATAL: ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching FAILED: ✅ no message matching required modules missing: ✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations ✅ found message matching .tar.gz created! Artefacts eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17573334150.tar.gz size: 106 MiB (111691255 bytes) entries: 10573 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all code-server/4.97.2.lua software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software code-server/4.97.2 reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Sep 08 12:17:04 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) accodring to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 573.802 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 583.389 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.67 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.69 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8834.7 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8098.78 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file slurm-541219.out ✅ no message matching ERROR: ✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

[ocaisa]

I'm a bit nervous about this one, as the current easyconfig approach cannot be used with RISC-V (which would require a from-source build via npm).

I guess it is ok for 2023.06 but the binaries are not using the EESSI runtime loader (specifically /home/ocaisa/eessi/versions/2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/icelake/software/code-server/4.100.2/lib/node).

EDIT:

Interestingly in $EBROOTCODEMINSERVER/lib/vscode/bin/code-server-oss there is exactly a fix for the linker issue (as well as some advice for patchelf usage).

The following seems to work just fine:

patchelf --set-interpreter /cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/compat/linux/x86_64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 $EBROOTCODEMINSERVER/lib/node

[boegel]

I'm a bit nervous about this one, as the current easyconfig approach cannot be used with RISC-V (which would require a from-source build via npm).

I guess it is ok for 2023.06 but the binaries are not using the EESSI runtime loader (specifically /home/ocaisa/eessi/versions/2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/icelake/software/code-server/4.100.2/lib/node).

EDIT:

Interestingly in $EBROOTCODEMINSERVER/lib/vscode/bin/code-server-oss there is exactly a fix for the linker issue (as well as some advice for patchelf usage).

The following seems to work just fine:

patchelf --set-interpreter /cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/compat/linux/x86_64/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 $EBROOTCODEMINSERVER/lib/node

@ocaisa We could tackle the patchelf through an EasyBuild hook?