⚠ This page is served via a proxy. Original site: https://github.com
This service does not collect credentials or authentication data.
Skip to content

Conversation

@bc-Vince
Copy link
Contributor

@bc-Vince bc-Vince commented Dec 10, 2025

Created a new guide for Company Account Registration in the GraphQL Storefront API, detailing workflows for guest and existing customers, related queries, and considerations for new Company accounts.

DEVDOCS-6508

What changed?

  • There is now a guide for Company account registration in stores using the B2B Edition GraphQL Storefront API.

Release notes draft

  • We have published a guide that covers the B2B Edition GraphQL Storefront API queries and mutations involved in registering new Company accounts in the Buyer Portal experience.

Anything else?

ping

…low in B2B Edition's GrapQL APIs

Created a new guide for Company Account Registration in the GraphQL Storefront API, detailing workflows for guest and existing customers, related queries, and considerations for new Company accounts.
@bc-Vince bc-Vince requested a review from bc-terra December 11, 2025 15:19
@bc-Vince bc-Vince added the ready for review This PR is complete and awaiting a review. label Dec 11, 2025
@bc-Vince bc-Vince marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2025 15:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@bc-terra bc-terra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only odd thing is the singular Tab in the Tabs environments (two of them). The page compiles fine.

I will not that having the links as absolute is a bit redundant, but it works.


Check if the provided email address is associated with a customer or Company user account. See [Registration for guest users](#registration-for-guest-users) to learn more about the `userType` values that the query can return.

<Tabs items={[`Request`]}>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not opposed to it, but is there value to having the Tabs here when there's only one tab?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@bc-Vince bc-Vince Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was an oversight on my part. I will remove the unnecessary "Tabs" architecture.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<Tabs items={[`Request`]}>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready for review This PR is complete and awaiting a review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants