⚠ This page is served via a proxy. Original site: https://github.com
This service does not collect credentials or authentication data.
Skip to content

Conversation

@javier-aliaga
Copy link
Contributor

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga commented Jan 13, 2026

Description

Dapr 1.17.0 endgame has started, we should start testing the new RCs.
This pr also includes:

  • Updating the sdk to use the latest version of dapr runtime. This change breaks down the dapr.proto into smaller proto files making so proto classes files are now in different location.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #[issue number]

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created/updated tests
  • Extended the documentation

Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the update-to-dapr-1.17.0.rc1 branch 2 times, most recently from 0037a63 to d575bff Compare January 14, 2026 08:42
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 08:50
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga requested review from a team as code owners January 14, 2026 08:50
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the update-to-dapr-1.17.0.rc1 branch 2 times, most recently from 148c141 to d275f94 Compare January 15, 2026 10:21
Signed-off-by: Javier Aliaga <[email protected]>
@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga force-pushed the update-to-dapr-1.17.0.rc1 branch from d275f94 to 9798647 Compare January 15, 2026 10:29
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.05607% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.91%. Comparing base (d759c53) to head (9798647).
⚠️ Report is 249 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...k/src/main/java/io/dapr/client/DaprClientImpl.java 92.77% 6 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
...al/subscription/EventSubscriberStreamObserver.java 84.37% 2 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1620      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.91%   78.91%   +2.00%     
- Complexity     1592     2074     +482     
============================================
  Files           145      227      +82     
  Lines          4843     6257    +1414     
  Branches        562      684     +122     
============================================
+ Hits           3725     4938    +1213     
- Misses          821      970     +149     
- Partials        297      349      +52     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@javier-aliaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dapr/maintainers-java-sdk @dapr/approvers-java-sdk can you review and let me know what you think about the proto changes.

@javier-aliaga javier-aliaga changed the title chore: Update dapr version chore: Update dapr version to 1.17.0-rc1 Jan 15, 2026
<grpc.version>1.69.0</grpc.version>
<protobuf.version>3.25.5</protobuf.version>
<dapr.proto.baseurl>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dapr/dapr/v1.16.0-rc.5/dapr/proto</dapr.proto.baseurl>
<dapr.proto.baseurl>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dapr/dapr/release-1.17/dapr/proto</dapr.proto.baseurl>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this also be an RC ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.17.0-rc.1

<artifactId>download-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${download-maven-plugin.version}</version>
<executions>
<execution>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe a dum question, can these be moved to parent pom ?

Copy link
Contributor

@siri-varma siri-varma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a couple of comments.

Rest LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants